Suppose one accepts MacKinnon and Dworkin's suggested statutory definition of . How does one who generally accepts MacKinnon and Dworkin's views on the pervasively harmful effect of , and who accepts a need for legal redress of the harms perpetrated by , deal with pornographic material? The ordinance proposed by MacKinnon and Dworkin would deal with such material by enacting legislation which gives people adversely affected by the works, which clearly fit their definition of pornography, a cause of action against the producers, vendors, ....